What are the problems if disgust is NOT suppressed during sex?
A postscript to Peter de Jong
As you might recall from a previous blog by Professor Peter de Jong, core sexual stimuli are generally high on disgust sensitivity and potency. This is strange because people come in contact with these stimuli on a daily basis and they generally express high sexual appetite for them. As discussed by Professor de Jong, sexual arousal affects our subjective responses in that it suppresses the disgust properties of specific sex stimuli and facilitates approach behavior. Since people can quickly relate to these findings, perhaps it is perceived as pop psychology. However, in that case we fail to appreciate its clinical implications.
Therefore in this blog I wish to give some insights into the existence of important problems of female sexual arousal and sexual pain disorders, such as vaginismus and dyspareunia. In dyspareunia, penetration of the vagina by the penis (or by dildos, fingers, or tampons) is only possible with pain. In vaginismus, it is completely impossible. In the recently published Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), these sexual pain disorders are now merged under the heading of “genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorders”, though discussion about this merging continues.
“If sexual arousal is low, then the disgusting properties of specific stimuli, which are relevant for the engagement in pleasurable sex, are not attenuated, nor is the hesitation to approach these stimuli. This could lead to problems with sexual engagement.”
Let’s go back to the issue of sexual arousal and disgust. There are multiple causes for low sexual arousal in women, including insufficient stimulation, past sexual traumatic experiences, and persistent negative emotions. If sexual arousal is low, then the disgusting properties of specific stimuli, which are relevant for the engagement in pleasurable sex, are not attenuated, nor is the hesitation to approach these stimuli. This could lead to problems with sexual engagement. Consequently, women might experience a lack of physiological readiness to have sex (for instance, a lack of vaginal lubrication), which in turn could increase friction and anxiety. These negative experiences may contribute to feeling pain during intercourse and might lead women to become hyper-vigilant and start interpreting ambiguous sexual cues as negative (for instance, normal smells might be labelled nasty and disgusting). It is thus possible that women acquire negative associations with sex (for instance, sex is painful, vaginal fluid smells bad, the penis is too large) and start to avoid sexual intercourse altogether. Over time, they might even develop a complete inability to have intercourse.
Relevant to this, studies from our lab have shown that, compared to sexually asymptomatic women, women diagnosed with vaginismus experience disgust responses towards erotic stimulation both at the subjective (explicit) level as well as at a more automatic (implicit) level. Moreover, in this group of women sex-related stimuli appear to elicit disgust rather than arousal (Borg et al., 2010). It is conceivable that this worsens the problem, since a typical response to disgust is avoidance behaviour (to create distance from the perceived contaminant).
“Women diagnosed with vaginismus experience disgust responses towards erotic stimulation both at the subjective (explicit) level as well as at a more automatic (implicit) level.”
Another potentially related issue involves the moral standard of a person. A few years ago we found more conservative and fewer liberal values in women with sexual penetration disorders compared to women without any sexual problems (Borg et al., 2011). The first group was also less willing than the second group to come into contact with sex-related stimuli in hypothetical scenarios such as going to a sex shop and touching a vibrator. Women with sexual pain disorders might thus avoid experiences that could confront their beliefs and instead this may reinforce their dysfunctional cognitions.
There are many psychological conditions, in both women and men, that could be attributed to a less functional interplay between disgust and sex. We have a number of ideas for expanding our research. For women with vaginismus or dyspareunia or other penetration-related problems, to counteract the disgusting properties of sex cues, it might be helpful to strengthen the sex-positive-arousal link. It might also be helpful to reduce the disgusting properties and contamination sensitivity and potency of sex stimuli, or of disgusting stimuli in general. This could be done by helping a woman to come into contact with her own vagina, for instance by asking her to touch and smell the vaginal fluids till she becomes more at ease with them (see de Jong et al., 2010). It would be relevant to test whether sexual stimuli in general, and the idea of penetration in particular, elicit less disgust and contamination fear after these types of interventions.
“To counteract the disgusting properties of sex cues, it might be helpful to strengthen the sex-positive-arousal link.”
Usually people do not think about the fact that sexual arousal drives a reduction in disgust properties, and this allows us to come into contact with and touch previously-considered disgusting stimuli like sweat, semen, vaginal fluid, and saliva. I hope this blog post leads us to take it for granted a little less, and that we become more aware of the problems some women face.
References
Borg., C., de Jong, P.J.,Weijmar Schultz, W. (2011) Vaginismus and dyspareunia: Relationship with general and sex-related moral standards. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8: 223–231.
Borg, C., de Jong, P.J.,Weijmar Schultz, W. (2010) Vaginismus and dyspareunia: Automatic vs. deliberate: Disgust responsivity. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7: 2149–2157.
de Jong, P.J., van Lankveld, J., Elgersma, H.J., & Borg, C. (2010). Disgust and sexual problems: Theoretical conceptualization and case illustrations. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 3: 24-40.
Dutch media coverage
NOTE: Image by Charmaine Borg
Great work! Keep it up. Nick.
Great article